Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 76294 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 09:12:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2001 09:12:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 18567 invoked by uid 97); 4 Dec 2001 09:12:26 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18523 invoked by uid 97); 4 Dec 2001 09:12:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 18479 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2001 09:12:24 -0000 Message-ID: From: GOMEZ Henri To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: JK versions Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:12:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >After reading the commit log - most changes related to jk_channel, >jk_registry, etc are pretty safe ( as they don't change any logic ). > >We could actually release Jk1.2 using the main tree - if everyone is >comfortable with that. If not - Oct21 is probably a good point >to branch >( the release date for 3.3 ). > >There are few fixes for ebcdic support and few small things that would >have to be re-applied. Let's get the old version, and then I'll reapply the EBCDIC changes. We should keep ajp12 is JK 1.2 :) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: