Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 78738 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 22:56:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2001 22:56:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 9162 invoked by uid 97); 19 Dec 2001 22:56:53 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9138 invoked by uid 97); 19 Dec 2001 22:56:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 9072 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2001 22:56:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:56:43 -0800 (PST) From: "Craig R. McClanahan" Sender: craigmcc@localhost To: Tomcat Developers List , Tom Drake Subject: Re: route id In-Reply-To: <01a101c188df$014a5de0$ec960040@allegro> Message-ID: <20011219144558.I82997-100000@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Tom Drake wrote: > Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 14:46:30 -0800 > From: Tom Drake > Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List , > Tom Drake > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: route id > > Costin: > > Should this routing id be an attribute of the one of the Container > objects (e.g. Server, Service), instead of the Manager? > Adding it to Engine would seem to be the easiest. It would then be visible from both the request processing pipeline and from the Manager. If that's ok with everyone, I will add it to both branches. > > Tom > Craig McClanahan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: