Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 29308 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 22:04:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO osaka.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.133) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 22:04:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 25992 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 22:07:04 -0000 Received: from nagoya.betaversion.org (192.18.49.131) by osaka.betaversion.org with SMTP; 1 Nov 2001 22:07:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 26463 invoked by uid 97); 1 Nov 2001 22:04:32 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 26453 invoked by uid 97); 1 Nov 2001 22:04:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19008 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2001 21:56:50 -0000 Subject: RE: Tomcat3.2.2 bug...? To: "Ignacio J. Ortega" Cc: "'John_Dove@mapinfo.com'" , "'tomcat-dev'" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 (Intl) 21 March 2000 Message-ID: From: John_Dove@mapinfo.com Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 16:58:27 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on LINK2/MapInfo Corp(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 11/01/2001 04:59:50 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>> Bugs imported from bugrat in Cortexity system can be found searching for >>> "BugRat Report#NNN" in the summary line closed and resolved bugs were >>> not imported On the official Apache bugdatabase (i.e. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ ), I could not find my reported Tomcat3.2.x bug. I searched for "BugRat Report#792" (without the quotes) ...but found nothing. I assume then, this must be one of the "resolved bugs" that did not get imported? Thanks Again, John Dove ------------------------------ John Dove MapInfo Tech Support "Ignacio J. Ortega" To: "'John_Dove@mapinfo.com'" , "'tomcat-dev'" s> cc: Subject: RE: Tomcat3.2.2 bug...? 11/01/01 02:01 PM You have posted to tomat-dev mail list at http://jakarta.apache.org/.. Cortexity was hosting a bug tracking system at his facilities many time ago this system is not used anymore, and the bugs were imported into bugzilla, now the bug tracking system is at http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/ Bugs imported from bugrat in Cortexity system can be found searching for "BugRat Report#NNN" in the summary line closed and resolved bugs were not imported Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -----Mensaje original----- > De: John_Dove@mapinfo.com [mailto:John_Dove@mapinfo.com] > Enviado el: jueves 1 de noviembre de 2001 19:34 > Para: Ignacio J. Ortega > Cc: 'John_Dove@mapinfo.com'; 'Tomcat Developers List' > Asunto: RE: Tomcat3.2.2 bug...? > > > > Hello Ignacio, > > > Thank you for the quick response. > > Are you part of the Apache Software Foundation? > Or are you part of Cortexity? > > Thanks again, > John Dove > > ------------------------------ > John Dove > MapInfo Tech Support > > > > > > > "Ignacio J. > > Ortega" To: "'Tomcat > Developers List'" > "'John_Dove@mapinfo.com'" > s> Subject: RE: > Tomcat3.2.2 bug...? > > > 11/01/01 01:19 > > PM > > > > > > > > > > You can safely ignore this exception. > > The explanation: > > This is caused by the interaction between tc 3.2.X and ie4.0 > and up, ie > abruptly breaks the connection when it finds a resource that > it already > has in cache.. > > 3.3 and up do not suffer this glitch .. > > > Saludos , > Ignacio J. Ortega > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > > De: John_Dove@mapinfo.com [mailto:John_Dove@mapinfo.com] > > Enviado el: jueves 1 de noviembre de 2001 16:21 > > Para: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org; tomcat-bugs@cortexity.com > > Asunto: Tomcat3.2.2 bug...? > > > > > > Hello Apache / Cortexity: > > > > > > I am a software engineer that works as an Enterprise Support > > Specialist at > > MapInfo Corporation, which > > is located in the United States of America. One of our > main products > > (MapInfo's "MapXtremeJava4.0") ships > > with TOMCAT3.2.2, and as of recent, we have been getting *customer > > complaints* that this version of > > Tomcat (i.e. version 3.2.2) is throwing the following > exception for no > > apparent reason: > > > > > > 2001-10-31 04:42:40 - ContextManager: SocketException > reading request, > > ignored - java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer > > at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAvailable(Native Method) > > at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketAvailable(Compiled Code) > > at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.available(Compiled Code) > > at java.net.SocketInputStream.available(Compiled Code) > > at > > org.apache.tomcat.service.http.HttpConnectionHandler.processCo > > nnection(Compiled > > > > Code) > > at > > org.apache.tomcat.service.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(Compiled Code) > > at > > org.apache.tomcat.util.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(Compiled > > Code) > > at java.lang.Thread.run(Compiled Code) > > > > (NOTE: we at MapInfo are able to consistently reproduce this error > > ourselves, in our testing lab.) > > > > After researching this exception on the internet, I came across the > > following site that appears to be a "bug report" list hosted > > by "BugRat," which claims this exception is a bug in the TOMCAT3.2.1 > > release. Here's a link to the site that says this: > > > > http://w6.metronet.com/~wjm/tomcat/2001/Jan/msg00721.html > > > > > > I am writing you both (i.e. both apache & cortexity) in order > > to confirm > > that this is indeed a bug. > > Specifically, here are my questions: > > > > [1] > > Is this a bug in TOMCAT3.2.1??? > > > > [2] > > Is this a bug in TOMCAT3.2.2??? > > > > [3] > > If it is a bug, can we safely IGNORE it? > > (Or is TOMCAT broken?) > > > > [4] > > Lastly, if it is a bug, will there be a PATCH issued? > > (Or some type of fix?) > > > > > > Thank you in advance for any information you can give regarding this > > matter. > > > > Sincerely, > > John Dove > > > > ------------------------------ > > John Dove > > MapInfo Corporation > > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: