Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 57077 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2001 00:35:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2001 00:35:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 10417 invoked by uid 97); 10 Nov 2001 00:34:57 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10401 invoked by uid 97); 10 Nov 2001 00:34:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "Tomcat Developers List" Reply-To: "Tomcat Developers List" Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 10390 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2001 00:34:56 -0000 Message-ID: <031c01c16980$488cc540$6a16a643@snvl1.sfba.home.com> From: "Remy Maucherat" To: "Tomcat Developers List" References: <20011109150554.E81514-100000@localhost> <3BEC6E62.50203@betaversion.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-4.0/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina Container.java Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:40:23 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > [...] > > I agree that it will, and it could happen... I just feel unconfortably > "left out" from the decisional/review process... I am active on the > HTTPD and APR lists (as many of the 3.3 guys are) and sorry, but I don't > see API changes going into CVS undiscussed and/or unannounced over > there... (learn from others) > > I don't ask much... When you start writing the code send out an email > saying "hey folks, I'm adding this method to blbalbalbal", lazy > consensus, all ok, everyone's happy... > > And if that didn't happen in the 3.x releases, well, I believe this is > the reason why we always felt the 3.x community as "non existent" till > recent times... (learn from our mistakes) Ok, ok. I get the message. Sorry, I should have posted something beforehand. Happy now ? BTW, I don't think 3.2/3.3 has/had a non-existent community. Remy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: