Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 52285 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2001 23:54:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 52276 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2001 23:54:10 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:49:22 -0700 (PDT) From: "Craig R. McClanahan" Sender: To: Tomcat Dev Subject: Re: [VOTE] Tomcat 4.0.1 release In-Reply-To: <017701c15347$76ad8030$6a16a643@intalio.com> Message-ID: <20011012164752.T16022-100000@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Remy Maucherat wrote: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [X] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help support it > [ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable to help support it > [ ] -0 I not in favor of the release > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > I'd also like to take this opportunity to apologize to the Tomcat developers for *not* calling a formal release vote on the 4.0 final release, and for a couple of license snafus that have subsequently been cleaned up. In the rush of final preparations, I let that responsibility slide. I'm glad to see that Remy is doing this correctly :-). Craig