Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7791 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2001 13:33:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 7781 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2001 13:33:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ryan Bloom Reply-To: rbb@covalent.net Organization: Covalent Technologies To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org, Justin Erenkrantz Subject: Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp/apache-2.0 mod_w ebapp.c Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 06:34:55 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <20010906180600.Z2482@ebuilt.com> In-Reply-To: <20010906180600.Z2482@ebuilt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20010907133456.2207E46DF4@koj.rkbloom.net> X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thursday 06 September 2001 18:06, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:52:50AM +0100, Pier Fumagalli wrote: > > Since there is no official release of httpd-2.0, I am confident that > > nobody will actually care unless they're testing something... And by > > "testing" good practice says "get the HEAD of CVS and try it out yourself > > if it doesn't work". Development happens on "head" and if someone forks > > off for a little while to do some porting to some weird operating > > systems, at the end those changes will have to be integrated with HEAD, > > so, there's no point in sticking with backward compatibility AT THIS > > POINT. > > +1 to what Pier said. (Ryan may chip in here too...) > > If you are using anything other than HEAD for httpd-2.0, I don't > care much about any bug reports you may have. The odds are that it'd > either be fixed or broken in a different manner. =) -- justin Don't try to mainain backwards compat in 2.0. We aren't even trying yet. Every release of 2.0 other than head has a serious problem, either a memory leek, or a security hole, or it can crash the machine. IF your not using HEAD of httpd-2.0, you have a problem. :-) Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net --------------------------------------------------------------