tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GOMEZ Henri <hgo...@slib.fr>
Subject RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3597] - Shutting down takes *ages*
Date Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:49:38 GMT
Try to upgrade IBM SDK to a more recent release.
The latest date from June 2001.


-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 



>-----Original Message-----
>From: bugzilla@apache.org [mailto:bugzilla@apache.org]
>Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 6:19 AM
>To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
>Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3597] - Shutting down takes *ages*
>
>
>DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
>RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
><http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3597>.
>ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
>INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
>
>http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3597
>
>
>
>
>
>------- Additional Comments From jeff@socialchange.net.au  
>2001-09-15 21:19 -------
>I think this is a JDK issue. For me, it only happens with a 
>certain version of 
>IBM's JDK:
>
>[jeff@kermit bin]$ java -version
>java version "1.3.0"
>Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.3.0)
>Classic VM (build 1.3.0, J2RE 1.3.0 IBM build cx130-20000815 
>(JIT enabled: jitc))
>
>That's on a Mandrake Linux box, kernel 2.4.3-20, glibc 2.2.2
>
>If I use Sun's 1.2.2 JDK instead (only one I had handy), on 
>the same box and
>same Tomcat 4.0rc2 install, it works fine, taking about 5 secs 
>to shut down.
>
>On a Debian box (2.4.4 kernel), the following IBM JDK, it also 
>works fine:
>
>java version "1.3.0"
>Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 
>Blackdown-1.3.0-FCS)
>Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build Blackdown-1.3.0-FCS, mixed mode)
>
>
>To anyone else experiencing this (eg David Lecomber): could 
>you please do a 
>'java -version' and report it? Also, under the offending IBM JDK, the
>startup.sh script couldn't automatically resolve CATALINA_HOME (see
>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=100043024215213&w
=2), and I'd be
interested if others have this problem too.

Right now, I'm happy for this bug to be closed, pending further evidence.

--Jeff

Mime
View raw message