tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bill Barker" <>
Subject Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues
Date Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:47:15 GMT
That's true of mod_jk in j-t-c.  At least through B2 the mod_jk that ships
with 3.3 uses r->uri.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Wannamaker" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues

> mod_jk uses (used?) r->unparsed_uri to preserve encoding.
> Therefore, any mod_rewrite munging of r->uri is invisible
> to mod_jk.  This is the issue to which Larry is referring,
> not Apache module ordering.
> Keith
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: Bill Barker []
> | Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 2:30 PM
> | To:
> | Subject: Re: Remaining Tomcat 3.3 Issues
> |
> |
> | Re. 11)  I use mod_rewrite + mod_jk regularly without problems.  The
> | is that the "out-of-the-box" model order puts mod_jk ahead of
> | The trick to make them play happily together is to simply re-order them
> | httpd.conf.  Of course, this has the downside that you can't use the
> | generated by ApacheConfig verbatim.  But if you want advanced
> | you have to expect to fiddle with the configuration.


This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above 
as the intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is 
PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL.  If you are not an intended recipient, 
you may not read, copy, or distribute this message or any attachment.  
If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately 
by e-mail and then delete all copies of this message and any attachments.

In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent 
through the Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive 
information, such as social security numbers, account numbers, personal 
identification numbers and passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) 

View raw message