Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 46439 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2001 11:19:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 46428 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2001 11:19:58 -0000 From: "Rob S." To: Subject: RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 07:20:55 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <996721051.3b68c19be30ec@www.mhsoftware.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > would become an enthusiast of Epic Neoclassicism if we left > copies of Paradise > Lost lying around their apartment. hehehe point well made =) > directories being junked up with source. Call me pedantic, but I > like my source > where it belongs and my bins where they belong. Agreed. IMHO it didn't make "sense" to be in there. If it wasn't in there and you were interested in development, you would gladly go to the site and download the source w/out giving it a second thought. - r