Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 90919 invoked by uid 500); 20 Aug 2001 12:55:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 90905 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 12:55:42 -0000 Message-ID: From: GOMEZ Henri To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: Sources in Binary Distributions Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N A little late +1 Thanks to remove sources from binaries :) That's how the majority of OSS projects works today. Source -> binaries (eventually packaging like RPM/DEB) - Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr (. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 >-----Original Message----- >From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@apache.org] >Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2001 1:18 AM >To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org >Subject: Re: Sources in Binary Distributions > > > > >On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Christopher Cain wrote: > >> >> On a related topic, I was a little surprised to find a >source directory >> in my "dist" build. > >Well, "ant dist" ***is*** how binary distributions (for both >the nightly >builds and releases) are created, so this should not be too much of a >surprise :-). > >Craig McClanahan >