Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Message-ID: <3B69B0FB.A880A898@mhsoftware.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:58:51 -0600
From: Christopher Cain <ccain@mhsoftware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sources in Binary Distributions
References: <2A0C111BE7E9D411854200105A9CB7851124A2@PST>
 <996781166.3b69ac6e9101b@mail.betaversion.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This whole trip is buggin'. I don't personally think it makes logical
sense to have source in a binary, but I'm not exactly losing sleep over
it either. I agree with Pier. So Pier, if you would *please* do the
offical [VOTE] honors with the cute little ballot thingy ...

Although I've said my piece on the matter and am officially done with
it, I would really like to get back to my SSL code instead of having to
sit here and defend my peeps from baseless sniper attacks from the
dev-list fringes ;-)

- Christopher

Remy Maucherat wrote:
> 
> I also plan to leave the source code in the Windows installer distribution,
> since IMO it's supposed to be a comprehensive "all-in-one" download. The source
> code is not installed by default.
> 
> Remy