tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GOMEZ Henri <hgo...@slib.fr>
Subject RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/t estHeader.java HttpRequest.java
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2001 20:13:45 GMT

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Schreibman, David [mailto:DSchreibman@eTranslate.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:17 PM
>To: 'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
>Subject: RE: cvs commit:
>jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/util/t estHeader.java
>HttpRequest.java
>
>
>For whatever it's worth, here are some changes I made to the 
>3.2.2 code base
>to add support for chunked requests.  I just did the work a 
>few days ago and
>am still in the process of moving them to 3.3.  Still, since 
>the topic came
>up now I thought it would be helpful to share my approach.  I have been
>running some heavy stress tests on this and have not seen any 
>problems yet.
>It would be great to run the changes through some unit tests as well.

You may have noticed that mod_jk in TC 3.3 is 
different from the one in TC 3.2. 
Also Ajp13 in Tomcat 3.3 (java) is also different since using
directly InputStream.

And mod_jk in jakarta-tomcat-connectors is 
also very different since there was some refactoring.

>From what I saw it seems you're on the right way, 
and I'm waiting to see your port to TC 3.3. 

Or if you like, I could try to port it to both 3.3 and J-T-C.

I've got many questions here and some refactory should be
done on that part of the code later, I don't like very much
the way the communication is done. May be something to rewrite
completly to Ajp14, adding others new commands (CHUNKED-DATA).

The goal will be to have a simpler (and so fastest) way to 
do the transfert.

Questions :

- Does the java part need to know that the incoming data came in CHUNKED ?
- Should we add others HTTP/1.1 commands like Range, Accept-Ranges, CONNECT
? 

What do you think about that ?



Mime
View raw message