Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 71799 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2001 02:02:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 71592 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2001 02:02:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 22:07:11 -0400 From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Subject: Re: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project : WAS: [Tomcat Documentation Redactors To Hire] Sender: gmj@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Message-id: <3B4128CF.5CAF59C@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i686) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en References: X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Brad Cox wrote: > > At 10:09 AM -0400 7/2/01, Rob S. wrote: > >1) Developers don't write them in lieu of coding. > >2) Users don't read them > >3...) ? > > http://www.c2.com/cgi-bin/wiki has a novel way of getting at the > problem. Not a panacea obviously, but what is? The one at that > address is perl-based; I can provide a tomcat/mod_jk/servlet based > one if there's interest. I don't have much wiki experience - however the one I am familiar with is a huge mud ball, contentwise. Would you describe the one above as a good example of wiki docs, or are there better ones? geir -- Geir Magnusson Jr. geirm@optonline.net System and Software Consulting Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/ You have a genius for suggesting things I've come a cropper with!