tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rob S." <rsli...@home.com>
Subject RE: [PRE-PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-doc sub-project : WAS: [TomcatDocumentation Redactors To Hire]
Date Sat, 07 Jul 2001 11:25:16 GMT
Unfortunatly, I won't be able to participate much in this discussion this
weekend since i know *0* about AWT and the Java cert (Monday morning, 9am)
apparently thinks you should =)  Sorry all...

> The important issue is *not* what transformation tool is used.  The

Oh, by "works for Catalina" I was stating that TC4 is already using the
tool; why not continue using it?

> * Docs should live in the source tree of the project that they
>   are about.  Although Henri's suggestion for jakarta-tomcat-docs
>   is noble, what you'll find in practice is that there is very little
>   documentation that is relevant across multiple versions of Tomcat.

I have a feeling that whatever is the same will be a lot of piecemeal here
and there, excluding of course, web-app documentation.  So far yourself,
Pier, and Henri are the only three TC developers to post their position on
that (re: inter-version relevancy).  Personally, I don't think there should
be a separate project, but I think I've already said that a few times =)

> * The files that are checked in should only be the XML sources, *not* the
>   generated files.  This varies from what Jon set up in jakarta-site2,
>   based on long and drawn out earlier discussions (same issues as those
>   surrounding checking JAR files into CVS :-).

Someone will have to setup something that exposes the latest generated
documentation on the Jakarta www site.  It's being done already for Struts,
so I guess that won't be a big problem.

> * At least two documentation webapps (developer-oriented and
>   user-oriented) would seem to be appropriate.  Having more than two

"developer" as in "web" or "Tomcat"?  I'm not sure why separating the doc
into two packages helps - perhaps I'm missing some obvious benefit trying to
think at 7:15am =)

- r


Mime
View raw message