tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From kevin seguin <seg...@motive.com>
Subject Re: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/java/org/apache/ajp/tomcat33 Ajp14Interceptor.java
Date Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:21:19 GMT
> 
>   I think we should move AjpRequest to o.a.tomcat.util.http.BaseRequest,
>   and have o.a.t.core.Request extend it.
> 
>   ( the util.http package contains low-level utils. The BaseRequest will
>   have the base fields for a http request, with various protocols
>   setting them. The core.Request will add all kind of tomcat3-specific
>   information, but should use the basic fields from the base object).
> 
>   Alternative: make BaseRequest final, as Remy did in coyote, and use
>   delegation.
> 
>   Both are fine as method names do not match - the second might be simpler to
>   implement ( if we keep the current method names - need to discuss that ).
> 


i've been thinking about this, and, well, isn't this BaseRequest you're
talking about kind of what org.apache.coyote.Request is?  does it make
sense to have two of these kinds of objects hanging around?  is
o.a.c.Request roughly equivalent to core.Request in tomcat 3??

Mime
View raw message