Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 44760 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2001 22:25:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 44669 invoked from network); 9 May 2001 22:25:24 -0000 X-Authentication-Warning: simona.wyn.org: costin owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 15:23:20 -0700 (PDT) From: cmanolache@yahoo.com X-Sender: costin@simona.wyn.org To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Collaborative Development (not Cat and Dog) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > > I feel a personal, moral, obligation to the thousands and thousands of > people who download Tomcat in the hopes of having a servlet container that > works, and who want to have confidence in a solid support and future +1 Very well put, for me it's the only reason I'm still subscribed to this list and working on tomcat. And of course, working with the great people on this list ( but unfortunately - and I'm sorry to say that - I don't think that alone would keep me on this project or offset the ugly ) Costin > growth path -- and we (develoeprs) have not yet provided an unambiguous > message to reassure them. > > > Remember: most 3.3 people were not that motivated to work on Catalina, > > and because they worked (and keep working) on stuff for 3.3 that has > > common usefulness, 4.x now can benefit form it. > > > > If it was not for 3.3, maybe they were working on something else. Are > > you sure they would be converted to 4.x? > > > > And many USERS (like me) could be now investing on some other tool. > > Staying around because of 3.3, maybe they can be converted to 4.x > > AFTER 4.x proves its value. > > > > Remember, by my definitions you're a DEVELOPER, not a USER :-). > > > > > Have fun, > > Paulo Gaspar > > > > > > (*) - Most of them much more silent and even less participative than > > myself. =;o) > > > > Craig > >