Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Message-ID: <361024C34A6DD2118689006097AE2B4D0102CE5C@css4.cs>
From: GOMEZ Henri <hgomez@slib.fr>
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4 Release
Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 23:53:52 +0200 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"

+0 but with RPM packaging ;)

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc@apache.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:22 AM
>To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
>Subject: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4 Release
>
>
>Now that the "Proposed Final Draft 2" versions of the Servlet 
>2.3 and JSP
>1.2 specs have been published (with Tomcat 4.0 updated to support the
>latest changes), and a ton of bug fixes have been made, I would like to
>propose that we create a "Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4" release as follows:
>
>  Release Manager:  Craig McClanahan
>  Code Freeze:  Thursday, May 10, 2001 at 05:00pm Pacific Time
>
>See the file "RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B4.txt" for a reasonably 
>up-to-date list
>of the changes to date.  This document will be updated with 
>any additional
>changes that are made, plus a list of known outstanding issues.
>
>Between now and the code freeze, I'd like us to focus on fixing
>outstanding bugs and catching the configuration documentation up to
>date.  I'm OK with continuing work on the new distributed 
>session stuff in
>the mean time (as long as it is not enabled in the default
>configuration), but please hold off on making substantive 
>changes in the
>core container until after the Beta 4 release.
>
>Comments?  Votes?
>
>The usual rules apply:
>  [ ] +1 = I agree with this proposal and will support it
>  [ ] +0 = I agree with this proposal, but do not have time to 
>support it
>  [ ] -0 = I do not agree with this proposal, but don't want to try
>           to block it
>  [ ] -1 = I do not agree with this proposal (requires reasons)
>
>
>Craig
>
>