Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19869 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2001 02:58:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19860 invoked from network); 8 May 2001 02:58:56 -0000 Message-ID: <011801c0d76a$b7b5e3f0$82deb018@c538761a> From: "Remy Maucherat" To: References: Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4 Release Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 19:58:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Now that the "Proposed Final Draft 2" versions of the Servlet 2.3 and JSP > 1.2 specs have been published (with Tomcat 4.0 updated to support the > latest changes), and a ton of bug fixes have been made, I would like to > propose that we create a "Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4" release as follows: > > Release Manager: Craig McClanahan > Code Freeze: Thursday, May 10, 2001 at 05:00pm Pacific Time > > See the file "RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B4.txt" for a reasonably up-to-date list > of the changes to date. This document will be updated with any additional > changes that are made, plus a list of known outstanding issues. > > Between now and the code freeze, I'd like us to focus on fixing > outstanding bugs and catching the configuration documentation up to > date. I'm OK with continuing work on the new distributed session stuff in > the mean time (as long as it is not enabled in the default > configuration), but please hold off on making substantive changes in the > core container until after the Beta 4 release. > > Comments? Votes? > > The usual rules apply: > [ ] +1 = I agree with this proposal and will support it > [ ] +0 = I agree with this proposal, but do not have time to support it > [ ] -0 = I do not agree with this proposal, but don't want to try > to block it > [ ] -1 = I do not agree with this proposal (requires reasons) +1. Remy