Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Message-ID: <008901c0d46e$01a2a020$5000a8c0@Meir>
From: "Meir Faraj" <farajm@netvision.net.il>
To: <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105071913490.86535-100000@localhost>
 <008501c0d76b$83453fc0$56a8fa18@C1529179A>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4 Release
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:44:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

+1 ;-)
it  start to be a working server , very good work , thanks :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Amy Roh" <amyroh@apache.org>
To: <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4 Release


> +1
>
> Amy
>
>
> > Now that the "Proposed Final Draft 2" versions of the Servlet 2.3 and
JSP
> > 1.2 specs have been published (with Tomcat 4.0 updated to support the
> > latest changes), and a ton of bug fixes have been made, I would like to
> > propose that we create a "Tomcat 4.0 Beta 4" release as follows:
> >
> >   Release Manager:  Craig McClanahan
> >   Code Freeze:  Thursday, May 10, 2001 at 05:00pm Pacific Time
> >
> > See the file "RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B4.txt" for a reasonably up-to-date list
> > of the changes to date.  This document will be updated with any
additional
> > changes that are made, plus a list of known outstanding issues.
> >
> > Between now and the code freeze, I'd like us to focus on fixing
> > outstanding bugs and catching the configuration documentation up to
> > date.  I'm OK with continuing work on the new distributed session stuff
in
> > the mean time (as long as it is not enabled in the default
> > configuration), but please hold off on making substantive changes in the
> > core container until after the Beta 4 release.
> >
> > Comments?  Votes?
> >
> > The usual rules apply:
> >   [ ] +1 = I agree with this proposal and will support it
> >   [ ] +0 = I agree with this proposal, but do not have time to support
it
> >   [ ] -0 = I do not agree with this proposal, but don't want to try
> >            to block it
> >   [ ] -1 = I do not agree with this proposal (requires reasons)
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
>
>