tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From GOMEZ Henri <>
Subject RE: virus warnings and
Date Tue, 15 May 2001 11:12:14 GMT
What's the problem here ?

I received only one copy....

Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL :        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jay Doggett []
>Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 1:11 PM
>Subject: virus warnings and
>In addition to the multiple virus warnings I am now receiving multiple
>copies of each message sent to the list.
>	Is it a wise idea to ban users who contaminate the 
>list. I am starting to
>think that it is necessary.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: GOMEZ Henri []
>Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 7:03 AM
>Subject: RE: configure for jakarta-tomcat-connectors
>>My idea is to build one connector per call of configure/make,
>>--with-java should
>>build the JNI support, correct?
>>I have noted that common contains jk_jni_worker.c, should not
>>we move it in jni?
>no, jk_jni_worker could also be used into apache 1.3/2.0.
>And that's HOW IBM use mod_jk on at least AS/400 using JNI
>instead of AJP12/AJP13...
>>> Many users asked about statically compiling mod_jk in Apache,
>>> could you add a --with-apache flag ?
>>Yes, but we cannot use apxs for that... Following the ideas of
>>mod_webapp we
>>should libtool for this purpose.
>>Then it is more easy to use libtool for everything.
>apxs is for DSO but the question was how to be sure the
>mod_jk stuff could be compiled statically in apache ?
>>> Do you think we could add also the config dir path to have
>>> default mod_jk.conf and installed ?
>>> feature which could be added, is the config
>>> ie: --sysconfdir=/etc/httpd/conf        (à la Redhat)
>>If we use --with-apxs the conf is given by apxs, in case we
>>use --with-apache
>>This means we need to support "make install".
>PS: I commited your Makefile and configure stuff !!!

View raw message