Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-tomcat-dev-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 74522 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2001 07:27:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Reply-To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 74312 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2001 07:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <361024C34A6DD2118689006097AE2B4D0102C91F@css4.cs> From: GOMEZ Henri To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: mod_webapp status? Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:27:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N I subscribed to apr-list to start learning more on APR. Having a cross system IO portable library is really a good thing.=20 I'm also working on AS/400 and if APR could run on this OS it will be a very good thing for my works developpements. May be something to investigate since AS/400 is really very posix (may be the most posix implementation I ever see). =20 :) Si la fortune vient en dormant, =E7a n'emp=EAche pas les emmerdements = de venir au r=E9veil. -- Pierre Dac >-----Original Message----- >From: cmanolache@yahoo.com [mailto:cmanolache@yahoo.com] >Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 7:00 PM >To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org >Subject: RE: mod_webapp status? > > >On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >> >Since mod_jk is using just a few APR-like functions, the transition >> >woulnd't be difficult - but it's important to do it at the=20 >right time. >> > >> >And IMHO that should come as a decision from tomcat-dev - I=20 >would feel >> >very bad if Henri or Dan would decide to switch to APR without=20 >> >a serious discussion on tomcat-dev.=20 >>=20 >> Don't worry, I never said I'll modify mod_jk to use APR, and I=20 >> didn't remember Dan speak about it. We're correcting the remaining >> bugs. > >Henri, I didn't said I'm worried that you would modify mod_jk=20 >to APR, but >do so without discussing it on tomcat-dev. > >I think APR is clearly the future for mod_jk, and that was the = original >intention ( as I remember from the old discussions ). > > >> You may read the various discussions between I and Dan about mod_jk >> and everybody known what we're doing.=20 > >And that's more important than the code itself - the fact that=20 >we are all >involved and can give feedback. > >Costin > >