Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 52853 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2001 13:59:48 -0000 Received: from hall.mail.mindspring.net (207.69.200.60) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 9 Feb 2001 13:59:48 -0000 Received: from grumman (pool-63.52.223.92.ipls.grid.net [63.52.223.92]) by hall.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA26874 for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:59:47 -0500 (EST) From: "Keith Wannamaker" To: Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Constants.java Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 08:58:45 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N |it is appropriate for bugs to be reported against 3.2.1. or NIGHTLY. Unfortunately, only the installer will know which is appropriate. Anybody else will misfile the bug. Given some of the bug reports I've seen, even the installer may misfile the bug. Standard Apache practice is to bump the subversion after a release. It is irrelevant if the new development ever goes golden or not. It is an unarguably bad thing for multiple copies of code floating around in public to have the same version number. Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith Wannamaker [mailto:Keith@Wannamaker.org] > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 5:53 PM > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core > Constants.java > > > No, this is absolutely necessary so bugs in dev builds don't get reported > as 3.2.1 bugs. "3.2.2-dev" would also be acceptable, but the version > should not remain at 3.2.1. > > Keith > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc Saegesser [mailto:marc.saegesser@apropos.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:04 AM > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core > Constants.java > > > I think this is premature. There is no 3.2.2 release until the > vote on the > release plan has passed on tomcat-dev. There needs to be a > little more time > provided for discussion of the plan prior to calling the vote. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: hgomez@apache.org [mailto:hgomez@apache.org] > > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 7:40 AM > > To: jakarta-tomcat-cvs@apache.org > > Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core > > Constants.java > > > > > > hgomez 01/02/08 05:39:50 > > > > Modified: src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core Tag: tomcat_32 > > Constants.java > > Log: > > Fixes release number > > > > Revision Changes Path > > No revision > > > > > > No revision > > > > > > 1.22.2.9 +1 -1 > > jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core/Attic/Constants.java > > > > Index: Constants.java > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: > > /home/cvs/jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/tomcat/core/Attic/Co > > nstants.java,v > > retrieving revision 1.22.2.8 > > retrieving revision 1.22.2.9 > > diff -u -r1.22.2.8 -r1.22.2.9 > > --- Constants.java 2000/12/12 04:51:38 1.22.2.8 > > +++ Constants.java 2001/02/08 13:39:49 1.22.2.9 > > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ > > > > public class Constants { > > public static final String TOMCAT_NAME = "Tomcat Web Server"; > > - public static final String TOMCAT_VERSION = "3.2.1"; > > + public static final String TOMCAT_VERSION = "3.2.2"; > > > > public static final String JSP_NAME = "JSP"; > > public static final String JSP_VERSION = "1.1";