Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 81191 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2001 22:09:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO takahe.whichever.com) (157.22.245.3) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 18 Jan 2001 22:09:28 -0000 Received: from [10.1.1.157] (gate.sp.collab.net [64.211.228.36]) by takahe.whichever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEB033301 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:09:31 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:09:29 -0800 Subject: Re: Interceptors ( was Re: 3.x vs 4.0 architecture Q's From: Jon Stevens To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3A676846.2899F486@eng.sun.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N on 1/18/01 2:03 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > IMHO, copying a web server (written in C, by the way) architecture, in and > of itself, is not a compelling argument to influence the design of a servlet > container written in an object oriented language like Java. +1 -jon