Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 64701 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2001 18:12:36 -0000 Received: from smtp-ft2.fr.colt.net (213.41.78.26) by h31.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 4 Jan 2001 18:12:36 -0000 Received: from css5.cs (www2.slib.fr [195.68.49.130]) by smtp-ft2.fr.colt.net with SMTP id f04ICsN29323 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:12:54 +0100 Received: from css4.cs (css4.cs [172.31.1.8]) by css5.cs (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA04082 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:12:32 +0100 Received: by css4.cs with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:12:31 +0100 Message-ID: <361024C34A6DD2118689006097AE2B4DBFE0A4@css4.cs> From: GOMEZ Henri To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTES] Tomcat 4.0-Beta-1 and New CVS Repositories Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 19:12:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N >so +1 , but i continue to not see any advantages in maintain another >repository.. > Like Nacho I turn my -1 to +1 since I don't want the TC 4.x development to be stopped or features freezed but I feel that It will became hard to find our way in 3.2, 3.3, 4.0 and 4.1