Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 34349 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2000 12:01:46 -0000 Received: from e23.nc.us.ibm.com (32.97.136.229) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Dec 2000 12:01:46 -0000 Received: from southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.3.209]) by e23.nc.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA13876 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 06:58:37 -0600 Received: from d04nm301.raleigh.ibm.com (d04nm201.raleigh.ibm.com [9.67.228.38]) by southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.95) with ESMTP id HAA38434 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 07:01:44 -0500 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat-4.0] building i s hard) To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000 Message-ID: From: "Sam Ruby" Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 06:56:02 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D04NM301/04/M/IBM(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21 March 2000) at 12/15/2000 07:01:44 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Jon Stevens wrote: > > I would say that the servlet api build process should > be "fixed" to build/install into directories with the > version number attached. Agreed. In the case of jakarta-regexp, can this be done instead of putting the version number on the name of the jar file itself? - Sam Ruby