Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 30203 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2000 12:42:42 -0000 Received: from mail.krankikom.de (HELO cochrane.krankikom.de) (194.77.169.5) by h29.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 28 Dec 2000 12:42:42 -0000 Received: from platt ([194.77.169.76]) by cochrane.krankikom.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA09004 for ; Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:42:40 +0100 From: "Paulo Gaspar" To: Subject: RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2000 13:54:29 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h29.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:jon@latchkey.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 22:32 > > > I wrote _a_lot__ of the code that went into 3.2, and I did more work > > than you can imagine, Jon. I did that even if I had a job that is not > > tomcat, but xml-xalan. > > In fact, you did some of that work during your day time job. :-) This is a rather stupid remark. Are you trying to attack Costin's relation with his employer? > > In any case - this is not about me, but about tomcat. I do my best to > > improve tomcat, if that's not enough for you - I'm sorry. > > Tomcat 3.x or 4.x? > Having a very stable Tomcat 3.3 would only do good to the Apache and Tomcat names. If (as many believe) it is possible to get a solid 3.3 before a solid 4.x, that would only pave the way for a wide 4.x acceptance. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar