Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 45980 invoked from network); 29 Dec 2000 12:21:43 -0000 Received: from cochrane.krankikom.de (194.77.169.5) by h29.sny.collab.net with SMTP; 29 Dec 2000 12:21:43 -0000 Received: from platt ([194.77.169.76]) by cochrane.krankikom.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA21152 for ; Fri, 29 Dec 2000 13:21:30 +0100 From: "Paulo Gaspar" To: Subject: RE: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 13:33:22 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Spam-Rating: h29.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sorry Duncan. I am in a different time zone and I reply to mails by the date order they were sent. (That is how you got a batch of replies from me altogether.) Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -----Original Message----- > From: James Duncan Davidson [mailto:duncan@x180.net] > Sent: Friday, December 29, 2000 00:44 > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Re: TC 4.0 vs. TC 3.x and division of labor > > > On 12/28/00 4:47 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" wrote: > > > Almost everybody is aware of Costin time limitations and > respects the fact > > that his work on Tomcat is purely voluntary (he is not paid to do it). > > > > Everybody respects Craig effort - including Costin (it sure > looks so from > > his postings). > > > > In fact, Jon is the only person trying to turn this into a lousy Costin > > versus Craig war. > > Sideline this *now*. This will get discussed at the PMC meeting. > > -- > James Duncan Davidson > duncan@x180.net > > !try; do() >