Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 47183 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2000 22:02:58 -0000 Received: from dnai-216-15-97-206.cust.dnai.com (HELO kali.betaversion.org) (216.15.97.206) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2000 22:02:58 -0000 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by kali.betaversion.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id OAA18029 for tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:07:22 -0800 (PST) From: Remy Maucherat X-Authentication-Warning: kali.betaversion.org: nobody set sender to remy@betaversion.org using -f To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Fuck It. Message-ID: <977436442.3a427f1a24a57@mail.betaversion.org> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 14:07:22 -0800 (PST) References: <20001221163131.21244.qmail@web515.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20001221163131.21244.qmail@web515.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2 X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Quoting Costin Manolache : > That's even worse - all the flames that start up > whenever code from 4.0 is reused in 3.x. What's the > problem ??? Are you afraid of "featurism" ( i.e. are > good for 4.0 but bad for 3.3 ) ? > > It's open source code, and it's right to reuse it > instead of reinventing the wheel. If someone writes a > JAAS authenticator for 4.0 - why not making it > available to 3.3 users too ? For the same reason the JServ guys aren't making them available for JServ, I suppose. > After all, if 4.0 is "better", that's because of the > architecture, not because of the features - or else > next spin will be that people should use 4.0 because > of all the features. That has been one of your three arguments for a while. Actually, I think that right now TC 3.3 has an edge feature-wise because of the web connectors. Remy