Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 14631 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2000 10:35:43 -0000 Received: from sun.syzygy.net (195.26.96.2) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Dec 2000 10:35:43 -0000 Received: from coltrane.bitBull.com (energy.syzygy.co.uk [195.26.97.140]) by sun.syzygy.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA28400 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:35:42 GMT Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20001211103345.00b58870@pop3.demon.co.uk> X-Sender: kief_bitbull@kief.demon.co.uk@pop3.demon.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 10:35:40 +0000 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org From: Kief Morris Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] JSSI for Tomcat In-Reply-To: <3A344748.BBDA7AE5@gefionsoftware.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hans Bergsten typed the following on 19:17 10/12/2000 -0800 >But maybe I'm missing something. Are you saying the whole SSI processing >should be done as an interceptor instead of as a servlet? Is this something that could be done as a Servlet 2.3 Filter, and so be completely container independent for 2.3 containers? Kief --- bitBull makes the Internet bite: http://www.bitBull.com/demos/