tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stuart Roebuck <>
Subject Re: [tomcat-4.0] building is hard
Date Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:41:58 GMT

On Thursday, December 14, 2000, at 09:44 AM, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote:

> Stuart Roebuck <> wrote: 
> > My preference would be to simply include the distributable jar files of 
> > required libraries in a lib/ or similar directory inside the tomcat directory. 
> > Those libraries that are distributable could be included in the CVS but 
> > optionally excluded from the nightly builds and distributions (to reduce file 
> > size).  Users would be asked to place the relevant .jar files of 
> > non-distributable libraries in the same place.  This is basically the model 
> > for cocoon - which is *way* simpler to build than tomcat.  This also makes 
> > life a lot easier when moves are made to use newer versions of libraries for 
> > Tomcat, because they can simply be updated in the CVS (if they are 
> > distributable). 
> Someone (me! :) proposed to do as they do in XML land with the Xerces 
> project. They distribute a simple "xerces-tools..." JAR containing all 
> libraries required for the build. What do you think? Would it be a good idea 
> to do the same for Tomcat? I'd rather not check in JARs in the CVS, but I 
> believe that a single big zip with all libraries would be great... 

That seems okay to me.

Having said that -

o  European, pay for your online connection time, contributers may prefer not having to download
all the JARS when only one has been updated;  and

o  Putting the JARs into CVS means you can still benefit from version control and recreate
previous versions that used earlier libraries.

But either solution would make life a whole lot easier for newbies.


Stuart Roebuck                        
Lead Developer                                  Mac OS X, Java, XML, etc.
View raw message