tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Pier P. Fumagalli" <p...@betaversion.org>
Subject Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x
Date Thu, 21 Dec 2000 10:41:22 GMT
Jon Stevens <jon@latchkey.com> wrote:
> on 12/19/2000 10:48 AM, "Larry Isaacs" <Larry.Isaacs@sas.com> wrote:
> 
>> If Tomcat 3.3 can prove it is as stable as Tomcat 3.2.x and is
>> more spec compliant than 3.2.x,
> 
> Why does it have to be called Tomcat 3.3?
> Why not Tomcat 3.2.x+1?

Because it's architecture is so much different from 3.2 :)

>> I think it would be a disservice to not release it as the final RI for
>> Servlet
>> 2.2/JSP 1.1.
> 
> I'm not suggesting that we not release it.

If the architecture doesn't change, neither do I :)

    Pier

-- 
Pier Fumagalli  <http://www.betaversion.org/>  <mailto:pier@betaversion.org>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------



Mime
View raw message