Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 69206 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2000 00:57:18 -0000 Received: from e23.nc.us.ibm.com (32.97.136.229) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Nov 2000 00:57:18 -0000 Received: from southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.3.209]) by e23.nc.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA47176 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 19:28:56 -0600 Received: from d04nms20.raleigh.ibm.com (d04nms19nms20.raleigh.ibm.com [9.67.228.10]) by southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.95) with ESMTP id TAA70470 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 2000 19:57:14 -0500 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.3 / 4.0 confusion, rant and plan... To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000 Message-ID: From: "Sam Ruby/Raleigh/IBM" Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2000 19:57:43 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D04NMS20/04/M/IBM(Release 5.0.3 (Intl)|21 March 2000) at 11/04/2000 07:57:17 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > > If you want to go on and make a 3.3, do it, but if you want to > implement Servlet 2.3 in that release, you'll get my -1... Whether I personally agree with 3.x design or not, as an ASF member myself, I believe that it is important to protect Costin's right to pursue it. It was not terribly long ago that what became Catalina was controversial. - Sam Ruby