Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1058 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2000 02:24:06 -0000 Received: from dnai-216-15-97-206.cust.dnai.com (HELO shiva.betaversion.org) (216.15.97.206) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2000 02:24:06 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (dhcp-4.betaversion.org [192.168.1.104]) by shiva.betaversion.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA06850 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 18:30:28 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 18:24:02 -0800 Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Tomcat 4.0 Milestone 5 From: "Pier P. Fumagalli" To: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Organization: Apache Software Foundation Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Paulo Gaspar wrote: > > I like the harmony we had in this list during the last few weeks between the > main defenders of Tomcat 3.x and of Tomcat 4. I would like it to stay that > way. > > Both lines have its usefulness (3.3 included in the pack). We are having an > effort on getting a Production Ready 3.2 NOW by the same people that are > fighting for new evolutions. > > Isn't this the way it should be? 100% agree on that, wholeheartedly... Pier (happy thanksgiving day!) -- Pier P. Fumagalli Apache Software Foundation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit... (Cicero: "De Finibus" 1.10.32)