Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 65738 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2000 18:07:29 -0000 Received: from merc95.us.sas.com (HELO merc95.na.sas.com) (149.173.6.5) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Nov 2000 18:07:29 -0000 Received: from merc95.na.sas.com ([127.0.0.1]) by merc95.na.sas.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id WWRKH0YP; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 13:07:01 -0500 Received: from 10.25.12.252 by merc95.na.sas.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 17 Nov 2000 13:07:01 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) Received: by MERC91.us.sas.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 13:07:00 -0500 Message-ID: <764CA2FF49EC054BA086FC8253A52DD7433238@merc09.us.sas.com> From: Larry Isaacs To: "'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'" Subject: RE: [Proposal] Tomcat 3.2b8 Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 13:06:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:Craig.McClanahan@eng.sun.com] > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 12:55 PM > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: [Proposal] Tomcat 3.2b8 > > > Thanks for all the bug reports on 3.2b7! We've been so successful at > identifying remaining bugs that I'd like to propose we do at > least one more beta > cycle (3.2b8) before calling it good. We need to make sure > that we didn't > introduce any regression errors with all the bug fixes -- and > we need to resolve > the JSP issues that Larry raised this morning. > > I propose to do a 3.2b8 build on Monday afternoon (which > should give us time to > address the remaining b7 issues that I know about). What do > you think? > > Craig > >