Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25453 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2000 20:01:50 -0000 Received: from lukla.sun.com (192.18.98.31) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Nov 2000 20:01:50 -0000 Received: from centralmail1.Central.Sun.COM ([129.147.62.10]) by lukla.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA12363 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:01:49 -0700 (MST) Received: from esun1as-mm. (esun1as-mm.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.34.144]) by centralmail1.Central.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with SMTP id KAA04901 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:51:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from eng.sun.com by esun1as-mm. (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id LAA27219; Fri, 10 Nov 2000 11:02:29 -0700 Message-ID: <3A0C356A.94C61ABF@eng.sun.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 09:50:34 -0800 From: "Craig R. McClanahan" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Ready for 3.2b7? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N It's been a week now, and I've committed > 20 patches to the 3.2 tree, ranging from simple tweaks to security problems to spec compliance bugs. I believe that I've gotten all of the critical bug reports submitted on the mailing lists or via BugRat. Does anyone know of any I've missed (see below for one issue I know is outstanding)? What I'd like to do is build a "beta 7" release this afternoon and post it. That will give people a chance to pound on it. Any critical bugs we find will need to be fixed, but we need to hold off on changing non-essential stuff so we can get a final 3.2 release out the door. NOTE: One issue that's been discussed in the last couple of days is problems supporting the "load balancing" feature for root webapps. I haven't seen a proposed patch for this, but understand from the comments of people that have tried kludges to work around it -- and it seems unreasonable to risk destabilizing things at this late date. I suggest that any work on fixing this problem be deferred to a post-3.2-final maintenance cycle. Craig McClanahan PS: Thanks to everyone for all the bug reports, and to Larry and Nacho for chipping in on the commits! PPS: When the 3.2 final release is completed, my personal focus is going to return to the Tomcat 4.0 code base (which does not suffer from any of the bugs patched in 3.2, although I did find one 4.0 bug along the way :-). If and when bugs show up in 3.2 final, I will be happy to commit patches that people supply -- but any big debugging effort or major new work on the 3.x track will need to be done by someone else.