Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 75018 invoked from network); 12 Oct 2000 20:29:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO s1.servlets.net) (root@209.221.135.4) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Oct 2000 20:29:32 -0000 Received: from gefionsoftware.com (lsanca1-ar8-068-099.biz.dsl.gtei.net [4.35.68.99]) by s1.servlets.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA17337 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:29:28 -0700 Message-ID: <39E62033.899133D9@gefionsoftware.com> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 13:33:55 -0700 From: Hans Bergsten Organization: Gefion software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en-US,en,sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat 3.2 proposal question References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Larry Isaacs wrote: > > Given that enhancing the distribution build process is > being considered, is it settled that the binary distribution > will continue using "jakarta-tomcat", or is it to be > switched to "tomcat"? > > In the documentation, I will try to make sure the Windows > examples would match unzipping the binary distribution > to the root of the drive being used in the example. My vote is to keep "jakarta-tomcat". The motive is selfish; that's the name I use in the examples in my JSP book. But I'm sure I'm not the only one, and that there's a lot of documentation all over the place that use this name. Everyone has an opinion about names, but finding a name that everyone agrees on is pretty much impossible. What would we really gain by changing it? Hans -- Hans Bergsten hans@gefionsoftware.com Gefion Software http://www.gefionsoftware.com