From jemiller@uchicago.edu Tue Oct 31 21:10:36 2000 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: moderator for tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 56541 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2000 21:10:36 -0000 Received: from sparrow.uchicago.edu (HELO sparrow.secns.uchicago.edu) (128.135.168.100) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 2000 21:10:36 -0000 Received: from kestrel ([128.135.99.14]) by sparrow.secns.uchicago.edu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:10:07 -0600 Message-ID: <007001c0437e$f21708b0$0e638780@secns.uchicago.edu> From: "Jonathan Eric Miller" To: "Tomcat Developer" Subject: SSLSocketFactory.class missing in Tomcat 3.2b6 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:10:06 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Oct 2000 21:10:07.0369 (UTC) FILETIME=[F222EF90:01C0437E] X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I'm not actually subscribed to this list, so, if you reply, please reply to me directly. I'm wondering if there is some reason that there is no SSLSocketFactory.class included with the Tomcat 3.2b6 binary distribution? I first ran into this problem with 3.2b2 and I would have thought that this would have been noticed and corrected by now. When I last dealt with this problem with 3.2b2, I was able to compile SSLSocketFactory.java that was included with the binary distribution. I guess it's just assumed that everyone that is using Tomcat doesn't mind having to build it from source. IMHO, though, one shouldn't have to build the system from source in order to get a functional system. Jon