Return-Path: <nick@cortexity.com>
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 48782 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2000 00:59:35 -0000
Received: from msp-26-164-174.mn.rr.com (HELO localhost.localdomain)
 (24.26.164.174)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Sep 2000 00:59:35 -0000
Received: from localhost (IDENT:nick@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA26290;
	Sun, 3 Sep 2000 18:57:55 -0500
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 18:57:54 -0500 (CDT)
From: Nick Bauman <nick@cortexity.com>
X-Sender: nick@localhost.localdomain
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
cc: BugRat Mail System <tomcat-bugs@cortexity.com>
Subject: Re: edit bug #1 by person #0(login: null)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009031832340.26123-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009031857150.26287-100000@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

login: null?

Is getRemoteUser() broken in Tomcat 3.1?

On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, Nick Bauman wrote:

> Sorry, I'm testing bugrat to get the audit capaibility fixed. Just ignore
> these messages (for bug #1)
> 
> On Sun, 3 Sep 2000, BugRat Mail System wrote:
> 
> > State changed from 'open' to 'closed'.
> > Close date changed from '07/27/2000 13:46:02' to '07/27/2000 13:46:0209/03/2000 18:29:49'.
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>