Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 45758 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2000 19:36:55 -0000 Received: from merc95.us.sas.com (149.173.6.5) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Sep 2000 19:36:55 -0000 Received: from merc95.us.sas.com ([127.0.0.1]) by merc95.us.sas.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2651.58) id SK5XQ47N; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:36:28 -0400 Received: from 10.19.11.6 by merc95.us.sas.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:36:27 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Received: by MERC92.us.sas.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58) id ; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:36:27 -0400 Message-ID: From: Larry Isaacs To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Performance on Win9x Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 15:36:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, I do most of my Tomcat work in WinNT, but I'm also doing some testing with Win98SE. I find that the test-tomcat.xml test runs in about a minute under WinNT on my 128Meg/500Mhz PIII, but takes about 15 minutes under Win98SE. I get the same kind of differential running WatchDog, a couple of minutes verses about 30 minutes. Do others with Win9x see test-tomcat.xml or WatchDog take this long? Doesn't anyone know of some system configuration changes or have suggestions that would improve this? Thanks. Larry __________ Larry Isaacs Larry.Isaacs@sas.com SAS Institute Inc.