RE: Outstanding bugs before 3.2 final?

Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 25699 invoked from network); 21 Sep 2000 11:21:53 -0000 Received: from mail.activcard.com (HELO hub1.hub.activcard.com) (207.93.240.18) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Sep 2000 11:21:53 -0000 Received: from usexchg1.activcard.com (USEXCHG1 [192.168.133.9]) by hub1.hub.activcard.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id RT96RQSC; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 04:21:58 -0700 Received: by USEXCHG1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 04:15:29 -0700 Message-ID: From: Jean-Noel Gadreau To: "'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'" Subject: RE: Outstanding bugs before 3.2 final? Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 04:15:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C023BD.3F48E2CA" X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------_=_NextPart_001_01C023BD.3F48E2CA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I have filed a while back a bug concerning the windows batch files which contain Unix-Style end of line which breaks under win98. (see bug report: http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/63 ). It seems that the problem still exists and it is quite painful to have to convert the files all the time. Do you think the fix would be part of 3.2 ? Best regards, Jean-Noel -----Original Message----- From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:Larry.Isaacs@sas.com] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 4:13 AM To: 'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org' Subject: RE: Outstanding bugs before 3.2 final? Hi Sam, I cleaned up some error handling last night and committed the changes this morning after some further testing. The change includes removing the stack traces from the default exception handling. I agree with Costin and others that this reveals more information than is desirable. Is it possible to include these changes in beta-5? The main spec issue that I'm aware of is that getServletPath(), getPathInfo(), and getPathTranslated() still return encoded strings instead of decoded per the Servlet 2.2 spec errata. It's not good for Tomcat 3.2 to not be in compliance, but would this be okay defer until Tomcat 3.3? This issue hasn't had much impact in the work I do, so I have't formed a strong opinion on this. Cheers, Larry -----Original Message----- From: rubys@us.ibm.com To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Sent: 9/20/00 6:56 PM Subject: RE: Outstanding bugs before 3.2 final? Alex Chaffee wrote: > > > Please mark ( or send to the list) all "MUST BE FIXED" > bugs ( i.e. if not > > fixed you'll -1 the release ). > > As far as I'm concerned, there are no such bugs. "Release for the > sake of release" is my motto. Just get it to pass Watchdog and ship. > Nacho wrote: > > Agree!! 3.2 now is far better than 3.1 final, and 3.3 is becoming to > be wayyyy better than 3.2, IMHO, is time for 3.2 !!! we all are tired > of 3.1 issues, i think. OK, I just submitted a build for beta 5. I'll post it [ and announce it this time, Hans! :-)] and put it up for a vote. Once 3.2 is final, I plan to immediately post a 3.3 beta. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C023BD.3F48E2CA Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Outstanding bugs before 3.2 final?

I have filed a while back a bug concerning the = windows batch files which contain Unix-Style end of line which breaks = under win98.

(see bug report: http://znutar.cortexity.com/BugRatViewer/ShowReport/63= ).

It seems that the problem still exists and it is = quite painful to have to convert the files all the time.

Do you think the fix would be part of 3.2 ?

Best regards,
Jean-Noel

-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Isaacs [mailto:Larry.Isaacs@sas.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 4:13 AM
To: 'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Outstanding bugs before 3.2 = final?

Hi Sam,

I cleaned up some error handling last night and = committed the changes this morning after some further testing. = The change includes removing the stack traces from the default = exception handling. I agree with Costin and others that this = reveals more information than is

desirable.

Is it possible to include these changes in = beta-5?

The main spec issue that I'm aware of is that = getServletPath(), getPathInfo(), and getPathTranslated() still return = encoded strings instead of decoded per the Servlet 2.2 spec = errata.

It's not good for Tomcat 3.2 to not be in compliance, = but would this be okay defer until Tomcat 3.3? This issue hasn't = had much impact in the work I do, so I have't formed a strong opinion = on this.

Cheers,
Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: rubys@us.ibm.com
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: 9/20/00 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: Outstanding bugs before 3.2 = final?

Alex Chaffee wrote:
>
> > Please mark ( or send to the list) = all "MUST BE FIXED"
> bugs ( i.e. if not
> > fixed you'll -1 the release ).
>
> As far as I'm concerned, there are no such = bugs. "Release for the
> sake of release" is my motto. Just = get it to pass Watchdog and ship.
>

Nacho wrote:
>
> Agree!! 3.2 now is far better than 3.1 final, = and 3.3 is becoming to
> be wayyyy better than 3.2, IMHO, is time for = 3.2 !!! we all are tired
> of 3.1 issues, i think.

OK, I just submitted a build for beta 5. I'll = post it [ and announce it
this time, Hans! :-)] and put it up for a = vote.

Once 3.2 is final, I plan to immediately post a 3.3 = beta.

---------------------------------------------------------------= ------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: = tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: = tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

------_=_NextPart_001_01C023BD.3F48E2CA--