Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 54942 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2000 02:09:46 -0000 Received: from mercury.sun.com (192.9.25.1) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Sep 2000 02:09:46 -0000 Received: from taller.eng.sun.com ([129.144.124.34]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA29282 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 19:09:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eng.sun.com (d-ucup02-124-239 [129.144.124.239]) by taller.eng.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with ESMTP id TAA18922 for ; Wed, 13 Sep 2000 19:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39C033E3.8AE78324@eng.sun.com> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 19:11:47 -0700 From: "Pier P. Fumagalli" Reply-To: pier.fumagalli@eng.sun.com Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: ApJServ directives *must* have been documented by *now*... right? References: <5E5BF8E44723D4119B6D00508BCC219AA412FF@mail1.hq.portera.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I feel guilty for that, being the first mod_jserv author... But I remember that SOME YEARS AGO, I wrote a simple README with an enumeration of all directives and what their meaning was... Because I had trouble describing ApJServMount... Tell me it's SOMEWHERE on the java.apache.org site, PLEEEEASE!!! Pier :) Michael Percy wrote: > > Joseph, > Thanks for the input. I have seen these pages... there is nothing there > specifically documenting the mod_jserv directives. There are a few examples, > but they are scattered across the site and all are very basic stuff. What I > would like to come up with is a comprehensive enumeration of configuration > options and their statuses. > > A couple of questions: > Does anyone have developer's notes or anything of that nature? > Who decides what directives go into the code? > > Thanks, > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joseph Chiu [mailto:jchiu@spun.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 5:59 PM > > To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org > > Subject: RE: ApJServ directives *must* have been documented > > by *now*... > > right? > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > I'm not sure if you have seen the java.apache.org pages on > > JServ. There are > > some useful links from there for mod_jserv configuration > > (although they, > > too, are not the most straight-forward). The information is primarily > > useful for server-side mod_jserv configuration; the > > jserv.properties is not > > a part of the TomCat mod_jserv implementation.; > > > > Joseph > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Percy [mailto:mpercy@portera.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 4:28 PM > > To: 'general@jakarta.apache.org'; 'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org' > > Subject: ApJServ directives *must* have been documented by *now*... > > right? > > > > > > I have been looking everywhere, and can barely find a speck > > of documentation > > for the Apache directives added by mod_jserv (the ApJServ* > > directives). The > > single piece I could find is a README archived in the Apache JServ CVS > > structure which was removed [Mon Nov 9 23:52:53 1998] which > > documents them a > > bit, but it is obsolete. > > (see > > http://www.working-dogs.com/cvsweb/index.cgi/jserv/src/c/Attic > > /README?r1=1.1 > > 0) > > > > I have compiled the attached documentation for the mod_jserv > > directives from > > bits and pieces wherever I could find them (including the > > source code), in > > Apache-style HTML. The thing that gets me is that 90% of > > people running > > Tomcat are still using mod_jserv, with no documentation > > whatsoever, probably > > because that is what all the examples are written in (and > > AFAIK mod_jk is > > not fully developed yet). > > > > These are extremely draft docs, and I have no idea how > > accurate it all is. > > If anyone has a few moments to correct/enhance/help with > > this, I would very > > much appreciate it.