tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nacho <na...@siapi.es>
Subject RE: Tomcat 3.2 beta3?
Date Fri, 01 Sep 2000 18:13:52 GMT
Nothing for hold up only some teting if you are sure, no problem, i'll
devote my time to something more productive :-).

Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Hans Bergsten [mailto:hans@gefionsoftware.com]
> Enviado el: viernes 1 de septiembre de 2000 20:15
> Para: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Asunto: Re: Tomcat 3.2 beta3?
> 
> 
> Nacho wrote:
> > 
> > I think this can be handled inside cmd or command adjusting the
> > classpath to use short names, and i think this can be done 
> in for too
> > with the new and weird uses it has, i'll do some testing.
> > 
> > I think java can use short filename, i'm right ?, and is 
> far better to
> > have an autload lib dir, i'll do some test tonight to see 
> if this can
> > work in NT but i can't  test it on Win98.
> 
> I doubt that it helps. At least on Windows 98, the file names 
> "for" assigns
> to the variable is already the short type. And AFAIK, there's no way
> around the limitation of "one directory level" in Windows 98.
> 
> Isn't the contents of the Tomcat lib directory pretty stable at this
> point? Do we really need this "auto lib dir" functionality? I 
> would like
> to see Tomcat 3.2 released ASAP and don't want to hold it up 
> unnecessarily.
> I therefore suggest we add the JAR files explicitly instead; 
> this works
> on both NT and Windows 98, and Larry has promised to fix the BAT file.
> 
> Hans
> -- 
> Hans Bergsten		hans@gefionsoftware.com
> Gefion Software		http://www.gefionsoftware.com
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

Mime
View raw message