Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 80029 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2000 18:44:17 -0000 Received: from dnai-216-15-97-206.cust.dnai.com (HELO kali.betaversion.org) (216.15.97.206) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Aug 2000 18:44:17 -0000 Received: from apache.org (sun.betaversion.org [192.168.1.4] (may be forged)) by kali.betaversion.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA04709 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3992F8A4.F0151680@apache.org> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:47:00 -0700 From: "Pier P. Fumagalli" Reply-To: pier@betaversion.org Organization: Apache Software Foundation X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSALS] Three Proposals for Development of Tomcat 4.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N "yhs@mimic.onesourcecorp.com" wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Pier P. Fumagalli wrote: > > > "yhs@mimic.onesourcecorp.com" wrote: > > > > > > ugh. please please maintain JDK 1.1 compatibility for runtime at > > > least. compiling is ok with JDK 1.2 but JDK 1.1 is a lot more stable for > > > high volume traffic at runtime. ive seen suns JDK 1.2.2 lock up under high > > > loads...1.1 doesnt. dropping 1.1 compatibility before 1.2 becomes stable > > > enough for production use is IMHO a really *bad* idea. > > > > I don't agree on maintaining JDK 1.1 compatibility... I believe it's now > > time to give the good old Platform 1.1 a sound kick in the butt and > > start working on Platform 2. > > In my personal experience I've never seen JDK 1.2.2 to lock, on both the > > operating systems I use (Windo$H and Solaris), actually never had the > > lightest problem. > > On what O/S did you see it happen? > > > > Pier > > > > BTW, Check your computer's date/time... Your message was dated Mon, 6 > > Jan 1997 19:01:52 -0500 (EST) > > linux kernel 2.2.16-3...standard redhat 6.2 box. note that it locked up > under heavy loads (load average of 40)..blackdowns kept running fine. > yup. my machines time is messed up..im playing with freebsd on that box. Uh... Linux... To get a decent VM I changed my Linux box into a Solaris box (Solaris 8 is free, who the hell cares?), and never had a problem ever since... I am a fellow Linux supporter, but as long as they don't fix a couple of issues on multithreading and in the glibc-2, well, I'm not going to use it... Too bad. BTW, did anyone had any experience with Linux and the new JDK 1.3 from Sun or IBM? Pier