tomcat-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Doshi, Gunjan" <gunjan_do...@merck.com>
Subject RE: Sessions - Memory Constraints
Date Mon, 17 Jul 2000 19:09:52 GMT
Does that mean if I have 1000 users on my site resulting in 1000 sessions
and hence 1000 copies of my object kept in memory.

This is a big overload.
Best Regards
Gunjan

> ----------
> From: 	Biju.Therakathilal
> (Exchange)[SMTP:Biju.Therakathilal@target.com]
> Reply To: 	tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Sent: 	Monday, July 17, 2000 2:38 PM
> To: 	'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
> Subject: 	RE: Sessions - Memory Constraints
> 
> When you put an object in session, the whole object is kept in memory.
> Normal objects doesn't have persistence capability. So the only way is to
> keep it in momory.
> 
> Biju
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doshi, Gunjan [mailto:gunjan_doshi@merck.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 1:33 PM
> To: 'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
> Subject: Sessions - Memory Constraints
> 
> 
> Friends:
> When you put a object in the session, does that mean the whole object is
> loaded in the memory. 
> 
> Because if the whole object is stored in the memory, then the chances of
> reaching the peak and getting out of memory errors are high.
> 
> Example: Say I have a image and I need to put that in the session. Does
> that
> mean the whole Image object gets stored in the memory for each session
> created. 
> 
> Or is it that only the reference to the object is loaded in the memory.
> 
> Best Regards
> Gunjan
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 

Mime
View raw message