Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 6801 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2000 02:52:10 -0000 Received: from e23.nc.us.ibm.com (32.97.136.229) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2000 02:52:10 -0000 Received: from southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.3.209]) by e23.nc.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA11206 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 22:32:00 -0500 From: rubys@us.ibm.com Received: from d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com (d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com [9.67.228.36]) by southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v4.9) with SMTP id WAA28390 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 22:52:10 -0400 Received: by d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 852568FD.000FBF17 ; Mon, 12 Jun 2000 22:51:59 -0400 X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBMUS To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Message-ID: <852568FD.000FBD97.00@d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 22:44:58 -0400 Subject: RE: VOTE: JDK1.2 compiler Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +0. I'm kinda ambivalent. If someone wants to do the work to make the code compilable with 1.1, I can't see rejecting the patches. Nor do I see the point in -1'ing code which requires 1.2 only at compile time. - Sam Ruby