Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 17821 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2000 17:22:18 -0000 Received: from merc94.us.sas.com (HELO merc94.pc.sas.com) (149.173.6.4) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Apr 2000 17:22:18 -0000 Received: from merc94.pc.sas.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merc94.pc.sas.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2651.58) id HCN73J6D; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:21:47 -0400 Received: from 10.19.11.6 by merc94.pc.sas.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 04 Apr 2000 13:21:47 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) Received: by merc92.us.sas.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58) id <22HSJ2ZP>; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:21:46 -0400 Message-ID: From: Larry Isaacs To: "'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'" Subject: RE: The plans are to cut a final release of 3.1 this week... Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:21:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2651.58) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Hi, Does anyone know if there are plans to fix Bug#108: Nested jsp:includes may not work properly? We have a fairly large demo web site currently being developed with Apache/JServ/GNUJSP that won't run with Tomcat because of this one. After looking at the code, I didn't think I had the time to understand the code well enough to suggest a fix. A simple solution wasn't apparent. Can this one be fixed or are the changes too risky? Thanks. Larry __________ Larry Isaacs Larry.Isaacs@sas.com SAS Institute Inc. -----Original Message----- From: rubys@us.ibm.com [mailto:rubys@us.ibm.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2000 11:21 AM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org; tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: The plans are to cut a final release of 3.1 this week... If anyone knows of any issues that they feel absolutely must be resolved before release, please speak now or forever hold your peace!