Return-Path: <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57832 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2000 10:42:15 -0000
Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com (32.97.136.227)
  by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Apr 2000 10:42:15 -0000
Received: from southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com
 [9.37.3.209])
	by e21.nc.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA28040;
	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 06:33:12 -0500
From: rubys@us.ibm.com
Received: from d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com (d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com
 [9.67.228.36])
	by southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (8.8.8m3/NCO v2.07) with SMTP id GAA33716;
	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 06:41:27 -0400
Received: by d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2
 5-20-1999))  id 852568B8.003AB628 ; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 06:41:17 -0400
X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBMUS
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
cc: serle@creator.co.za
Message-ID: <852568B8.003AB576.00@d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 06:36:52 -0400
Subject: Re: The plans are to cut a final release of 3.1 this week...
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Rating: locus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N



Serle Shuman wrote:
>On this topic, since apache  "owns" the Tomcat development, are apache
>members opposed to Tomcat being run as an alternative to apache or is the
>focus more on Tomcat being run as an apache pluggin?

My experience with other ASF members and Tomcat developers is that we are
not opposed to Tomcat being run either as an alternative to Apache or as a
plug in to a competitive commercial server.  In fact, 3.1 actually includes
a plug in for IIS....

- Sam Ruby