Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 57030 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2000 15:43:18 -0000 Received: from europa.teoco.com (HELO ffxdc2.ffx.teoco.com) (@216.181.27.68) by locus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Feb 2000 15:43:18 -0000 Received: by ffxdc2.ffx.teoco.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id <1F9401TD>; Tue, 8 Feb 2000 10:37:52 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Griggs, James" To: "'tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org'" Subject: Tomcat vs. Resin Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 10:37:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01BF724A.759463CE" ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF724A.759463CE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" I ran an informal test for 9 hours last night on a Win98 PC comparing the latest tomcat(apache.org) code and the latest resin (caucho.com) both using Suns JDK 1.2. I used 2 instances of socrates to simulate 100 users requesting a hello.jsp file at random intervals. Tomcat and Resin were running at the same time on different ports. Result: Tomcat: Resin: Total Requests Handled 26094 6546375 Total Requests Dropped 4691 0 Requests per Second .1 195 Average Latency 98.17 .15 I'm assuming the dramatic difference in requests handled is due to a 60 second timeout on dropped requests. I'm wondering if anyone can explain the dramatic difference in the results? Am I doing something wrong here to cripple Tomcat? (... and since I know the question will be asked: I have no affiliation with Caucho ;o) Jim Griggs jim@netgenShopper.com ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF724A.759463CE--