Return-Path: <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Received: (qmail 86885 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2000 19:10:20 -0000
Received: from e23.nc.us.ibm.com (32.97.136.229)
  by 63.211.145.10 with SMTP; 23 Jan 2000 19:10:20 -0000
Received: from southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com
 [9.37.3.209])
	by e23.nc.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA49330
	for <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 13:55:33 -0600
From: rubys@us.ibm.com
Received: from d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com (d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com
 [9.67.228.36])
	by southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (8.8.8m2/NCO v2.06) with SMTP id OAA46786
	for <tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org>; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 14:10:18 -0500
Received: by d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2
 5-20-1999))  id 8525686F.00694D25 ; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 14:10:10 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: IBMUS
To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org
Message-ID: <8525686F.00691538.00@d54mta04.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 14:04:20 -0500
Subject: Re: Javadoc2.java
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline



Jon wrote:

>> P.S.  All kidding aside - adding a javadoc task into the build.xml for
>> jakarta-ant would go a long way towards keeping this function working.
>> It also might have the positive side effect of getting more people to
>> actually document their code as they write it (what does
>> javadoc.setOld do?).
>
>read the javadoc for that method:
>
>"Build javadoc to look like JDK 1.1"
>
>I wrote that. ;-)

Did you check it in?  I can't find that text anywhere...

- Sam Ruby