Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 87230 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2000 18:09:28 -0000 Received: from mercury.sun.com (192.9.25.1) by 63.211.145.10 with SMTP; 6 Jan 2000 18:09:28 -0000 Received: from shorter.eng.sun.com ([129.144.124.35]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17318 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:08:13 -0800 (PST) From: Costin.Manolache@eng.sun.com Received: from eng.sun.com (costin [129.144.251.103]) by shorter.eng.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with ESMTP id KAA23707 for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 10:08:12 -0800 (PST) Sender: Costin.Manolache@eng.sun.com Message-ID: <3874DA12.A45839B9@eng.sun.com> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2000 18:08:18 +0000 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: [LONG TERM PLAN] Proposed Architecture for Tomcat.Next Servlet Container References: <3866D000.2D544552@mytownnet.com> <3873A1A6.2685D1E2@eng.sun.com> <3874AFD1.83EBFD15@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > I like Craig ideas and I like Costin's search for evolutionary paths. > > I really hope you guys can find an agreement for that, otherwise, the > friction that develops will not help anyone. I don't see any "friction" - again, we see the same picture and where we see different details we can have both ways implemented ( thanks to OO and Java). Costin